Armie Hammer’s ‘Citizen Vigilante’ Secures Worldwide Distribution Following Dramatic Elon Musk Intervention (EXCLUSIVE)

Armie Hammer’s ‘Citizen Vigilante’ Secures Worldwide Distribution Following Dramatic Elon Musk Intervention (EXCLUSIVE)


Quiver Distribution has taken worldwide rights, excluding U.Okay., German-speaking territories, South Korea and Taiwan, to Armie Hammer’s controversial comeback film “Citizen Vigilante.”

The distributor, which is led by co-presidents Jeff Sackman and Berry Meyerowitz, already holds North American rights and launched the motion thriller there on June 19.

The deal comes after a dramatic intervention by Elon Musk, who posted the movie on his X account – which has 240 million followers – to obtain in its entirety without spending a dime for 48 hours, from Thursday to Saturday.

Chatting with Selection on Monday, the film’s German director, Uwe Boll, stated Musk had contacted the crew behind Boll’s U.S. podcast, “Uwe Boll Uncooked,” which he hosts with Gary Otto, earlier than posting the film on X.

“He contacted my U.S. podcast, however not me straight, they usually advised me, like, ‘We acquired a message from Elon Musk,’” he defined. “I believed that it have to be a parody account… I imply, you’re not likely considering that he would contact you, however then it turned out it was true.

“However I didn’t actually chat myself with him or discuss to him. It was very fast, . I believe this man, I don’t know what he’s doing per day, however I believe his consideration went like quick, . So, I felt additionally if we don’t in a means comply with do it, he would’ve simply moved on.” Requested if Musk had truly requested for permission to put up the movie on X, Boll replied, “Mainly, sure.”

Offering the movie without spending a dime could have harm the incomes potential of the movie, however, equally, it has gifted the movie the type of publicity that an indie distributor like Quiver would by no means be capable of afford.

“There may be, in fact, a great and a foul aspect of the X posting,” Boll stated. “The query it’s important to consider is: Is that bringing extra money ultimately, or is that costing me some huge cash? You already know, you get plenty of PR, however you don’t get some huge cash. So, we are going to determine that out within the subsequent 4 or six weeks.”

Boll added that, given the “political energy” that the film unleashed, and “then it was solely out within the U.S. and Canada, it felt a bit like: No, we must always, for a short while not less than, give this film to the world.’” He defined that the movie doesn’t have a score within the U.Okay. but, and was denied a score in Germany, and – aside from Korea and Taiwan – it hadn’t regarded possible that it might be picked up in different territories, so he had little to lose from agreeing to let Musk put up the movie on X. “So, that’s the factor, you are feeling like, ‘Why not,’ ? Like, simply go for it.”

In North America, the movie is out there on iTunes, Amazon, Fandango and Google Play, and Boll estimates it has generated income of round $600,000 up to now. Given the funds, which he estimates is round $2 million, he nonetheless has a method to go earlier than recouping the funds, in addition to producing sufficient cash for the sequel to “Citizen Vigilante,” which he needs to launch subsequent 12 months.

“While you make a profitable film, you all the time hope that you would be able to make a second half, and it might make sense to ship [Sanders, the vigilante played by Hammer] to England or to ship him to America, after which we go from there.”

Though he stated he has some concepts for the sequel, there isn’t a script as but. Requested if Hammer would return within the sequel, he stated, “I believe he can be completely happy to do it.” Selection reached out to Hammer’s consultant to substantiate if the actor would reprise the position, however has obtained no reply as but.

Selection’s evaluation of “Citizen Vigilante” said that Boll “delivers a violent, incoherent, morally bankrupt slice of exploitation,” however the writer-director is unfazed by this damning judgment. “I personally like exploitation films,” he stated, including that he was a fan of the films of John Carpenter, George A. Romero’s “Daybreak of the Lifeless” and “Loss of life Want.” “So, I’m not towards this type of film generally, and I don’t assume that’s an insult. I don’t attempt to be Tarkovsky.”

He claimed that plenty of the unfavorable opinions had come from writers with a political standpoint against his personal, including, “They can’t stand to face the political actuality.”

Boll does have not less than one high-profile admirer within the enterprise, nevertheless. Author-director Roger Avary, who received an Oscar with Quentin Tarantino for the “Pulp Fiction” screenplay, posted an admiring evaluation of the movie from the Nationwide Conservative web site on his X account, and posed the query, “Is [Boll] the boldest and bravest auteur working in cinema at the moment?” Boll, reposting this, said, “Roger Avary loves it,” and stated in an accompanying video, “Thanks Roger Avary. You aren’t a pussy as all the opposite people who find themselves shy to talk out.” To which Avary responded, “ ‘You’re not a pussy’ is occurring my tombstone. Thanks, Uwe!”