Appeals Court docket Orders Harvey Weinstein Resentencing, Although Conviction Stands

Appeals Court docket Orders Harvey Weinstein Resentencing, Although Conviction Stands


A state appeals court docket has upheld Harvey Weinstein’s rape conviction in California whereas ordering him to be resentenced.

Weinstein is at the moment serving a 16-year sentence for his California conviction, the upper finish of the utmost time period due to his prior responsible verdict in New York. A 3-judge panel of California’s 2nd District Court docket of Attraction discovered on Friday that the sentence needs to be revisited after that conviction was overturned.

Extra from The Hollywood Reporter

“The sentence is vacated and the matter is remanded for resentencing,” famous the docket. “In all different respects, the judgment is affirmed.”

In a press release, a spokesperson for Weinstein stated the previous movie producer will enchantment to the California Supreme Court docket and that his attorneys “stay assured that important authorized points deserve additional consideration.” He added, “Whereas the court docket affirmed the convictions, it additionally acknowledged that Mr. Weinstein is entitled to a brand new sentencing listening to.”

The order was issued the identical day {that a} New York state court docket decide dismissed a third-degree rape cost in opposition to Weinstein after Manhattan prosecutors stated they wouldn’t pursue a fourth trial. He awaits sentencing for a conviction on a single court docket of prison sexual act in opposition to former Mission Runway assistant Miriam Haley. Prosecutors stated they’ll transfer for a 20-year jail time period.

Since 2020, Weinstein has confronted 4 trials in two states. Two juries in New York have deadlocked on a cost associated as to whether he raped Jessica Mann, who elected to not proceed testifying in a fourth trial, in a lodge room in 2013.

“It’s clear, when a convicted rapist is awarded privileges to proceed to protect a jury from previous settlements, nondisclosure agreements, prior convictions, or different abuse, there is no such thing as a true justice for a sufferer of sexual assault when that rapist is a predator,” she stated in a press release.

In 2024, the New York’s highest court docket overturned Weinstein’s 2020 rape conviction after discovering that the decide who oversaw the trial “erroneously admitted testimony of uncharged, alleged prior sexual acts” in what amounted to an “abuse of judicial discretion.”

In contrast to in New York, courts in California are allowed to introduce proof that exhibit a defendant’s propensity to commit intercourse crimes, even when the allegations haven’t led to formal fees. Such proof is barely allowed in New York courts when it’s mandatory to supply historical past on a defendant’s motive, intent or frequent scheme to hold out the alleged crimes.

Better of The Hollywood Reporter

Join THR’s Publication. For the newest information, observe us on Fb, Twitter, and Instagram.